Archive for the ‘Chicago Sports’ Category

“Nobody Wants Huet”

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

Over the weekend I went shopping for Blackhawks souvenirs and came away with a lesson on human nature.  It happened at the Field of Dreams memorabilia shop at Woodfield Shopping Center in Schaumburg.

The store has an impressive selection of Blackhawks memorabilia, from pucks and plaques to framed photos.  Going through a stack of gorgeous pre-matted 8×10s, I noticed one player was conspicuous by his absence:  Antti Niemi.  I asked a store employee if I might have been looking in the wrong place for the Hawks’ netminder.  “No,” he quickly replied, “we’re all out of Niemis.”  He shouted to another gentleman behind the counter, “Do we have anymore Niemis?”  The other guy just shook his head.

“But,” I chuckled, “I see you still have lots of Cristobal Huet.”  They had at least a half dozen photos of the other Hawks’ goalie.  The first gentleman looks at me and says, almost sheepishly, “Nobody wants Huet.”

That’s when it dawned on me how true that was.  I couldn’t help thinking about that as I paid for my pictures and walked out of the store.  Ever since the team clinched the title, every Blackhawk who stayed in town has suddenly become a hot commodity, commanding what I would guess to be premium fees to shake hands and sign autographs at stores, auto dealerships and shopping malls.  Even fill-ins such as Jordan Hendry were getting top billing in some places.  But there was one player who didn’t seem to be making the rounds of the glad-hand circuit:  Cristobal Huet.  Is there any place you’ve noticed that’s hosting a Huet autograph signing?  I bet not.

I don’t know if Huet had a reason to leave town right after the celebration or if he’s still here but laying low.  Either way, it’s not fair that he’s become persona non grata among fans, especially after being a contributor to the Blackhawks’ greatest season going back almost 50 years.  Huet was actually the starting goaltender when the ’09-’10 season began and, along the way, appeared in 48 games, earning the same number of wins as Niemi, 26.  True, he wasn’t a world-beater, performing below league average some of the time, and his wobbles at the end of the season couldn’t have come at a worse time for fans and their short memories.  Furthermore, it doesn’t help that his large salary is often cited as the reason the Hawks have serious cap issues this off-season.  But Huet was always ready when the Hawks counted on him, especially in the early part of the season, and his salary is the fault of Hawks’ management, not him.  Fans should also realize that, even on championship teams, players can have subpar years.

Since the team clinched the Cup two weeks ago, Blackhawks fans have been a happy, contented lot.  I’m proud to say I’m one of them.  But I’m a bit disappointed in my fellow fans who’ve been giving Cristobal Huet grief, from booing him at the rally downtown to totally ignoring him at the souvenir stands.  At a time when there’s plenty of celebratory afterglow to go around, Huet deserves to bask in his share of it.  At least his name is on the Cup, where it’ll be forever.

My Kind of Sports Town

Monday, June 14th, 2010

Call it a championship perfectly earned, acknowledged and celebrated.   You can say it was old school or a refreshing change of pace.  Either way, the Blackhawks’ victory in the Stanley Cup and the city’s reaction to it couldn’t have been scripted any better.

As for the Hawks themselves, how could you not root for them?  The Blackhawks were an exciting, energetic team that appealed to everyone, from young fans to people like me from the Tony-O/Golden Jet/Stan Mikita generation who never got to see that stellar crew win a Cup.  The 2010 Hawks went 16-and-6 over their last 22 games against premiere competition.  They methodically overcame everything that could have been used as an excuse for failure:  losing home ice advantage, questionable officiating, their opponents’ physical play against their speed and finesse game.  They rose to every challenge and won with dignity, class and old-fashioned hard work.

Then came all the celebrations which followed Wednesday’s clincher.  There were so many high points we don’t have enough space here to list them all.  Let’s review just a handful that had me reaching for the kleenex:  Toews’ emerging from the plane in the wee hours of Thursday morning to give us our first glimpse at the Cup; the throngs that greeted our conquering heroes downtown Friday morning; the reception Hossa got up on stage when his name was announced; the young players looking like they were truly soaking it all in and not taking it for granted.  And, when it was all over, the crowd eventually went home, no storefronts were smashed and downtown was left perfectly intact.

I’m proud to be a Chicago Blackhawk fan.  At the same time, I’ve never been prouder to be a Chicagoan.  We showed the world a big city can still celebrate a sports championship the way it should be.

Thank Goodness We Have the Blackhawks . . .

Friday, May 14th, 2010

. . . or what else would we have to talk about in Chicago sports these days?

Quick:  when was the last time a Stanley Cup Finals featured two Original Six teams?

We’re a couple of major steps from having that happen, but wouldn’t it be neat if it did this season?  To wit:

  1. The Bruins would have to beat Philadelphia tonight to insure an Original Six team would represent the Eastern Conference.  If the Flyers win, then the Canadiens would have to beat them in the conference finals.
  2. The Blackhawks would have to beat San Jose.

As for the latter, the Hawks are a better team than the Sharks.  But who’s to say which Hawks team will show up on any given afternoon/night—the one that manhandled the Canucks all three games in Vancouver or played totally uninspired hockey in both home losses during the series?

Still, I’m feeling good about the whole thing.  Rick’s pick:  Blackhawks in seven.

I’m not going to use the word “choke” because, at the highest level of professional athletics, I’m not convinced it ever happens, but the Bruins’ dropping four in a row to lose their round with the Flyers is a collapse of mammoth proportions, far exceeding the ‘69  or ‘03 Cubs or ‘64 Phillies.

It’s a dirty rotten shame that the network playoff practices currently in place are keeping Pat Foley out of the broadcast booth from here on out.

In baseball, we’re one month into the season, and I’ve already seen three things I’ve never witnessed in 41 years of watching the game:

  1. Mark Buehrle’s between-the-legs desperation toss to Paul Konerko to nail the Indians’ Lou Marson at first on Opening Day.
  2. Marlon Byrd’s no-look behind-the-back catch.
  3. Starlin Castro driving in an MLB record six runs in his very first game.  (Know how hard it is to break an MLB record anymore?  The game’s been around forever, and most benchmarks are out of reach.)

I’m getting the impression that Jim Hendry is much better at solving problems than avoiding them.  Unloading Todd Hundley and getting Mark Grudzielanek and Eric Karros in 2002, for example.  And sending Milton Bradley to Seattle for Carlos Silva this past winter.  But who backed the Cubs into the financial corner they find themselves in right now with those untradeable contracts (Soriano, Fukudome, Zambrano)?

Of the top five highest payrolls in MLB (Yankees, Red Sox, Cubs, Phillies, Mets), which team is the one most obviously underperforming?  And the Cubs are likely stuck for the next couple years, because they can’t take on any significant salary.

So, which of the Chicago baseball teams will be the first to reach .500?  Will either?  At that point in the season, will we even care?

(The last Cup Finals to feature two Original Six teams was 32 years ago:  1978-1979, when the Canadiens defeated the Rangers in 5 games.)

Reflecting on the Olympics

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Among people I know, it seems everybody settled in with their favorite event (figure skating, ice dancing or snowboarding, generally, and in my case, ice hockey) and made the coverage on NBC or MSNBC part of their evening routine the past couple weeks.  Then again, I realize there is a dissenting viewpoint out there that couldn’t care less  (e.g., my father-in-law called my wife after the first weekend to say, “Tired of the Olympics yet?”).

Ryan Miller was a deserving MVP in men’s hockey.  And dream, Blackhawk fans, of how easily he could have been OUR #1 goalie right now.  In the 1999 NHL draft, he was available until the 5th round, when he was taken by Buffalo.  With Miller still on the board, the Hawks chose the eminently forgettable Steve McCarthy, Dmitri Levinski, Stepan Mokhov, and Michael Jacobsen instead of Miller for four rounds.  True, the Hawks weren’t the only ones who whiffed on Miller, but wouldn’t your feelings going into the playoffs be a lot different with him between the pipes?

Televising the action during the three periods commercial-free—thanks to a deal with DirecTV—was fantastic.  Unless you actually attend a game, you never get to see what the players do during extended TV timeouts. Luongo, for instance, never hesitated to skate over to his bench, lift up his mask and grab some refreshment.  You could see the strain on his face the whole game during the extended breaks.

I’ve become captivated by curling.  It’s an odd activity and questionable as a real “sport” in the same way archery, golf and bowling are—to me, they seem much more a skill than a sport.  No matter, I surprised myself by not being bored watching either the men’s or women’s competition  in curling.

I don’t like the idea of the televising network’s exclusivity on the rights to action footage from the games.  Still photos are fine for ESPN The Magazine, but in the television world of technical bells and whistles, they fall very flat.  And that’s all the other networks can use.

I have trouble with the idea that, in keeping the medals count for the individual nations, gold, silver and bronze medals are considered equal in scoring.  For instance, this was the final count we saw in the paper this morning:

USA – 37 (9 Gold, 15 Silver, 13 Bronze)

Germany – 30 (10 Gold, 13 Silver, 7 Bronze)

Canada – 26 (14 Gold, 7 Silver, 5 Bronze)

Gold medals should be worth more than silver, which should be worth more than bronze in the medal standings–something like gold medals 3 points, silver medals 2 and bronze medals 1. That would give us this revised scoreboard:

USA – 70 points

Germany – 63 points

Canada – 61 points

The rankings haven’t changed, but the extra Golds push Canada closer to second place.  And, if you think all medals should be considered equal in merit, ask Duncan Keith if he wouldn’t mind trading his for Patrick Kane’s.

The gold medal game had all the drama you’d want in a finale–it was outstanding.  The fact that it got a 23.4 rating in Chicago–which put it in Bears territory–didn’t surprise me in the least.

Since I Haven’t Done a Sports Blog in Awhile . . .

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Watching the Caribbean World Series in Venezuela this weekend gave me an appreciation for Major League Baseball’s regulations on what’s permissible on big league uniforms, caps and helmets.  The players down there are all walking eyesores, covered from head to toe with a jumble of advertising logos.  Worst of all, it looks like every player seems to have the same name.  On the backs of all their jersey tops, above the number, it said “Coca-Cola” on Saturday, “Orange” on Sunday.

Sure, the Blackhawks won Saturday night.  But they should’ve had a shutout.  Campbell’s stupid penalty, taken behind the play, combined with Sopel’s bonehead unsportsmanlike conduct call 26 seconds later, gave the Blues a two-man advantage, which led to the goal which ended Niemi’s bid for his fifth shutout.

Richard Dent didn’t make it this time around.  But, unlike MLB, at least the NFL’s Board of Selectors aren’t shy about putting people into their Hall.

My brother-in-law’s constantly on the prowl for Blackhawks tickets.  He tells me he’s being priced out of the market now, even when it comes to regular season “cheap” seats in the 300 level.  I’ll tell you:  the closer the tickets get to the $200 mark, the more attractive my own private box becomes.  Washroom and refreshments just a few steps away with never any waiting, free parking and climate-controlled perfection—my living room.

With Ryne Sandberg’s being the most likely candidate to succeed Lou Piniella when Lou’s deal expires, it sets up the possibility of a grand ’84 Cubs reunion on the field in ’11.  Ryno could tap Sarge Matthews, Zonk Moreland and Bob Dernier as coaches.  By the way, Ryno deserves a shot at the top job.

On the one hand, seeing how quickly the Blackhawks turned around their fortunes gives me some hope for the Bears.  On the other, what did it take for the Hawks to make the big leap forward?  A change at the very top of the organization.  Somehow, I don’t think that’s a scenario we can count on at Halas Hall anytime soon.

What did I like most about the Super Bowl?  Two things.  First, that we can refer to it by its true name here (not “The Big Game,” which is just plain silly, if you ask me).  Second, how could I ever quarrel about a sporting event that starts at 5:30 and is completely over with by 9:00?  (This is a point I wouldn’t have made—say—twenty years ago when I was a wee bit more youthful, by the way.)

Losers Make Page One, Winners Make Page . . . Eight?

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

The Blackhawks must be wondering what they have to do to make the front page of the Sun-Times sports section.  Whipping the Wild 4-1 last night, winning their fourth in a row and 11 of their last 13, combining a young, hungry offense with the NHL’s stingiest defense, boasting the best record in the league and selling out the United Center night after night—essentially being the most dominant team Chicago’s had the past twelve months—earned them on a spot on page eight today.  Page eight.  With not even one line on page one.

What kept the Hawks off the front page?  The Bears, who aren’t even playing anymore.  The same 7 and 9 Bears who, for the last four months, have driven us to distraction with their frustrating, inept, embarrassing play.  Tuesday they called a press conference to announce they were doing just what people expected (even Richard Roeper in the Sun-Times today described the moves as “a surprise to no one”), and for that they get front page treatment.  The Bears fire six inconsequential coaches (I challenge you to name one of them besides Ron Turner) on the heels of a terrible season, and they’re given all the ink.

Chicago’s a Bears town.  I get that.  All things being equal, they should have the spotlight on them most of the time, since that’s what the fans want.  But, at the moment, all things aren’t equal.  In fact, they aren’t even close.  The Blackhawks are doing everything right, and they deserve the lion’s share of coverage.  Go Hawks!

How to Build an 81 Win Team (Out of a 97 Win Team)

Sunday, June 28th, 2009

Some quick hits as we approach the mid-season mark . . .

 

No matter who wins today, the Cubs and Sox have been amazingly evenly matched since interleague play began in 1997.  Of the 70 games that have been played:

The White Sox have 35 wins and the Cubs have 35.

The White Sox have scored 344 runs, the Cubs, 341.

Neither team can claim true bragging rights.  For that to happen, one team is going to have to dominate the series for several years in a row.

 

I had to chuckle when I read Toni Ginnetti’s column yesterday in the Sun-Times describing a Cubs’ pitcher as “young Randy Wells.”  Randy might be young compared to me or you, Toni, but he’ll be 27 in August and only a year younger than Carlos Zambrano, and I haven’t heard anyone refer to him as “young Carlos Zambrano” in a long time.

 

Between late May and mid June, in 22 games, Alfonso Soriano was 14 for 99, a .141 average.  Since Soriano bats leadoff, it’s like hitting your pitcher first in the order–for 22 games.  Worse yet, since Soriano followed the #9 hitter in the batting order each time except for the first inning, it was like having TWO pitchers hitting back to back for 22 games.  And you wonder why you’re not scoring runs?

 

Can we give Jim Hendry anything but a failing grade for the moves he made in the off-season?  Has there been a single one that’s worked out?  Let’s look at ‘em all:

 

Kevin Gregg.  Anybody out there feel confident when Gregg comes into a game?  Maybe you remember last August 15 in Florida.  The Marlins had a 5-3 lead against the Cubs going into the top of the 9th.  He came into the game for Florida, and this is what happened:

 

DeRosa led off and Gregg walked him.

Fontenot grounded out.

Johnson singled.

Daryle Ward sent one over the rightfield wall off Gregg, giving the visiting Cubs a 6-5 lead. 

 

It turned out to be Gregg’s 7th blown save of 2008.  He says he was hampered by a sore left knee at the time. Today, his knee problems are supposedly behind him. 

But look at the events that transpired that inning.  How many times have we seen him blow a lead and a save in nearly the same fashion this season—on a healthy knee?

 

Milton Bradley.  Easily the worst free agent signing in all of baseball this off-season.

 

Aaron Heilman.  “Better than Bobby Howry” is about all you can say.  Talk about damning with faint praise.

 

Aaron Miles.  The definition of a spare part, with limited versatility in the field and no pop in his bat.  His value is debatable when he’s hitting .300.  Where he is today, at .200, he’s worthless.

 

Joey Gathright.  Signed as a free agent.  Lasted a month with the team. Had an OPS of .481 (!) when he was traded.  By the way, he was traded for . . .

 

Ryan Freel, who, incredibly enough, has an even lower OPS than Gathright, .297. 

 

David Patton.  Always the last man out of the bullpen, he forces Lou to overuse everybody else.  He’s certainly not an improvement over Michael Wuertz,whom they traded this off-season.

 

Koyie Hill.  Is all we can say about him, “better than Paul Bako?”  And he isn’t by much. 

 

Luis Vizcaino.  Gone.  For nothing in return.  Garrett Olson.  Flipped for Aaron Heilman.

 

Which leaves us with the one good move he’s made since last October:

 

Micah Hoffpauir.  Replaced Daryle Ward. 

 

I’ve been a big fan of Jim Hendry’s since he took over the GM role in 2002.  I’m sure he’d be the first to tell you this hasn’t been a good nine months for him.

I’ve Learned Never to Call ‘Em “Blue!”*

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

On the bookshelf in my office sit some of the greatest books ever written on baseball:  Ball Four, The Boys of Summer, The Long Season, October 1964, Weaver on Strategy.  I can tell you right now:  none of them was any more eye-opening than As They See ‘Em, a new book written by New York Times reporter Bruce Weber (Simon & Schuster, 2009).  I definitely view the game through different eyes now.

 

As They See ‘Em is a book about umpiring which, it turns out, is a terribly difficult job.  The author spent nearly three years preparing to write the book.  First, he attended Jim Evans’ umpiring school in Florida, then hit the road with a crew of minor league umpires.  He worked Little League and major league spring training.  He interviewed dozens of current and former major league umpires.  Through it all, there was a single undeniable theme:  umpiring in an isolating, thankless, exhausting job.  And, to top it off, among those who choose to follow its career path, Weber reveals over 90% never make it to the big leagues.

 

What could make the job so hard?  After all, it’s simply a matter of memorizing the rule book, right?  Of course, learning and being able to apply the rule book are the foundations of umpiring.  But there’s also a huge physical component to the job.  Being able to station yourself in just the right position on the field to have an optimal view of a play in order to make the proper call is just as important.  I learned that every batted ball puts at least two umpires in motion, scurrying to that ideal spot to observe the play, something I can’t help noticing whenever I watch a game now.   And how about the home plate umpire, who is required to repeatedly bend over, squat and then stand up on average 400 times in a single game? 

 

Then there’s the mental aspect, which is just as grueling as the physical part.  Think of some of the most vehement arguments that you’ve seen erupt at a ballgame.  The dropped third strike in game two of the 2005 ALCS, with A.J. Pierzynski running to first.  The fan Jeffrey Maier interfering with a fly ball in the 1996 ALCS.  George Brett and the pine tar incident.  The missed call at first in game six of the 1985 World Series between the Cardinals and Royals.   You’ll get to relive each of those hotly debated situations through the umpires who were unwittingly caught in the middle of them:  Doug Eddings, Richie Garcia, Tim McClelland and Don Denkinger.

 

I had a hard time putting down As They See ‘Em.  In fact, I finished the book in one weekend.  It’s that engrossing.  And it made clear to me there really should be law against yelling out a certain phrase that, unfortunately, has been a part of the national pastime since the beginning.  You know the one.  “Kill the umpire.” 

 

*Umpires, as a rule, despise being called “Blue.”  

 

 

The Mighty Blackhawks

Sunday, June 21st, 2009

I can’t believe we’re still talking about the Blackhawks.  This is May, right?  This is easily the biggest sports story in Chicago in years, the biggest turnaround by a Chicago sports franchise in my lifetime.  I only wish my dad were around to see it.

 

Unlike my friends’ dads, mine really wasn’t into sports.  But, when it came to the Blackhawks, my dad would be the first to grab the prime spot in front of the old black and white set we had in our family room.  He’d be there, shoes off and feet up, all set for the opening face-off for every televised game (we didn’t have many of those back then, you might recall).  Whenever the Hawks would be playing at home, he’d have the radio turned up at high volume, and the magnificent play-by-play of Lloyd Pettit would reverberate throughout not only his workshop downstairs but the entire basement.

 

I became a Blackhawk fan at the same time Tony Esposito arrived on the scene in 1969.  Tony and his 15 shutouts were a sensation that year.  My father, however, never hesitated to remind me that Glenn Hall was even a better goalie, how “he was a big guy who filled the entire net,” leaving opposing shooters little room to score on him.

 

My dad and I had few common interests, it turned out.  But we had the Blackhawks.  The Bobby Hull, Stan Mikita, Pat Stapleton, Doug Jarrett, Pit Martin Blackhawks.  He and I attended only one sporting event together.  Fittingly, it was a Blackhawks game at the old Chicago Stadium, as exciting a night as I ever shared with my dad.

 

Who knows how far the Hawks will go in the playoffs this year?  It doesn’t really matter to me.  Call me a fair-weather fan if you’d like, since I haven’t rooted for them in a long time, but my interest in the Blackhawks has been rekindled this year.  And every game I watch puts me right on the couch with my dad, our emotions rising and falling with each goal scored or given up.  That’s made this season even more remarkable to me.

Related Links:

SaxTrax.com|BaseballProspectus.com|BleedCubbieBlue.com|LTHForum.com|IMDB.com|FiveThirtyEight.com|PuckProspectus.com